Nissan North America, Inc.
Total Incidents
17
ADS
0
ADAS
17
Fatalities
1
Injuries
8
Models
6
States
12
Avg Pre-Crash Speed
50 mph
Consumer Complaints
0
NHTSA Investigations
312
Key Findings
- โข100% of Nissan North America, Inc.'s incidents involve ADAS systems
- โขMost common crash scenario: Unknown in Unknown conditions
- โขAverage pre-crash speed: 50 mph (vs 36 mph overall)
- โขFatality rate: 5.9% of incidents
Top Models
| Model | Incidents | Fatalities | Injuries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ariya | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Rogue | 5 | โ | 4 |
| Rogue SV | 2 | โ | 2 |
| Ariya MPV | 1 | โ | โ |
| QX50 | 1 | โ | 1 |
| Rogue Sport | 1 | โ | โ |
Top States
Monthly Trend
Model Breakdown
Top Crash Types
Weather Conditions
Recent Incidents
8/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs to report an incident on 7/[XXX]/2022. The customer alleged an autopilot malfunction caused the vehicle to move to the opposite side of traffic flow and hit two curves. There was no report of transport to a hospital for medical treatment, fatality, vehicle tow-away, air bag deployment, or vulnerable road user. Customer refused to respond to additi
The information contained in this report is based solely on Nissan's notification via telematics that a vehicle equipped with Pro Pilot Assist 2.0 was involved in an incident involving an air bag deployment. The system was active in "hands-on" mode within 30 seconds of the incident. Nissan is currently examining its ability to provide additional details that may be protected by consumer privacy l
The information contained in this report is based on Nissan's understanding of the allegations received during Claimant's discussions with Nissan's Consumer Affairs representatives and Nissan's preliminary vehicle inspection. On 8/21/25 claimant notified Nissan Consumer Affairs of an accident which reportedly occurred on 8/[XXX]/25. The Claimant stated that the Claimant's son was driving the ve
The information contained in this report is based on Nissan's understanding of the allegations received during Claimant's discussions with Nissan's Consumer Affairs representatives and vehicle inspector, as well as results from Nissan's vehicle inspection. On 6/28/24 claimant notified Nissan Consumer Affairs of an accident which reportedly occurred on 5/[XXX]/24. The claimant states that ProPilot
The information contained in this report is based solely on Nissan's understanding of the allegations received during dealer's discussions with Nissan Techline representatives. The incident vehicle is an Enterprise rental car. The customer operating the vehicle at the time of the incident stated the vehicle pulled him to the right due to lane assist. Damage is reportedly evident to the right side
On July [XXX], 2024 Nissan learned of a news article reporting on July [XXX] of an accident involving an Ariya. The incident reportedly took place at the intersection of [XXX] in Shelbyville, TN, both of which are not limited access highways. On [XXX], 2024 Nissan determined that ProPilot Assist 1.0 was active ("hands-on" mode) within 30 seconds of the incident. Telematics data was last transmitt
The information contained in this report is based solely on Nissan's notification via telematics that a vehicle equipped with Pro Pilot Assist 2.0 was involved in an incident involving an air bag deployment. The system was active in hands-on mode within 30 seconds of the incident.Nissan is currently examining its ability to provide additional details that may be protected by consumer privacy laws
The information contained in this report is based solely on Nissan's notification via telematics that a vehicle equipped with Pro Pilot Assist 2.0 was involved in an incident involving an air bag deployment. The system was active in hands-on mode within 30 seconds of the incident. Nissan is currently examining its ability to provide additional details that may be protected by consumer privacy laws
The information contained in this report is based soley on Nissan's notification on May 3, 2024 via telematics that a vehicle equipped with Pro Pilot Assist 2.0 was involved in an incident involving an air bag deployment. ProPilot Assist 1.0 was active within 30 seconds of the incident. The deployment took place in the area of [XXX] in Coronado, CA. Nissan is currently examining its ability to pr
The information contained in this report is based on Nissan's notification via telematics that a vehicle equipped with Pro Pilot Assist 2.0 was involved in an incident involving an air bag deployment, as well as Nissan's understanding of the allegations received during Claimant's discussions with Nissan's Consumer Affairs representatives on 4/24/2024. The system was active within 30 seconds of the
View all 17 recent incidents โNHTSA Investigations (312)
20150318
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
20210917
Showing 10 of 312 investigations.
Related Analysis
Geographic Risk: Your City's AV Safety Score
Not all cities are equal for autonomous vehicle safety. San Francisco has 1,170 incidents while most cities have zero. See the full geographic risk breakdown.
data deep diveTesla's 3,092-Incident Problem: The Autopilot Crash Record
Tesla accounts for nearly half of all reported AV/ADAS incidents. We break down every number โ by model, severity, and trend.
investigationThe FSD Death Toll: Every Fatality Linked to Tesla's Automated Systems
56 people have died in crashes involving Tesla's Autopilot or FSD. We document what we know.